Brookland Streets: Meet Me on the Corner of Lansing and Argyle
Posted in Brookland, Old School Brookland on August 5th, 2010 by robert.malesky – 5 Comments
- (Bob Malesky is a 40-year Brookland resident and previous poster to Brookland Avenue who has just completed a new book. It’s a photographic history, entitled “The Catholic University of America,” for Arcadia Publishing. Bob is a frequent contributor to Brookland Avenue.)
Brookland’s street names have changed over the 123 years since the neighborhood was founded. Many of the names were never really used, but survive on subdivision maps from the early years. Developers named the streets, so they could vary from subdivision to subdivision.
The original 1887 plat map of the first subdivision, called simply “Brookland” contained street names based on trees – Elm St., Pine St., Walnut St., etc. Those were soon changed. The street names were altered at least twice before the city officially changed them in 1901 to their present incarnations.
There are discrepancies on different early maps, but the following chart seems to give the best indication of the original names and how they changed. The name of the street that became Lawrence is unreadable on the original plat map:
Linden St. –> Newark –> Fort –> Otis
Laurel St. –> Milwaukee –> Providence –> Newton
Elm St. –> Lowell –> Lansing –> Monroe
Unreadable – Keokuk –> Hartford –> Lawrence
Pine St. –> Joliet –> Frankfort –> Kearny
Walnut St. –> Indianapolis –> Dover –> Jackson
Cedar St. –> Hartford –> Concord –> Irving
The numbered cross streets also changed around this time. According to a 1901 story in the Washington Post, 9th St. was originally Queen St., 10th St. was Wallace St., 12th St. was Duncan St., 13th was Burns St. and 14th was Argyle St.
Also at this time Bunker Hill Rd. was changing to Michigan Ave. as it was widened and paved.

- Another neat story about Brookland comes from the Washington Post from April, 1902, which is after the time the city “formalized” the names of the streets. Obviously, that didn’t take hold right away:
- “Some of the streets have as many as four names, and there are few that have not at least two. The result is that people are given wrong directions or are unable to find the right street when properly directed. It is necessary, said Dr. Patten, that something should be done to remedy this evil. The naming of the streets should be done in a systematic manner and one name only should be used as the official designation.”
So clearly, even though the city had approved the final name changes in 1901, they weren’t in effect yet as of April, 1902. The 1901 story said the names would go into effect when they were formally recorded in the office of the surveyor, so I guess that took a while. It must have been awfully confusing during those first fifteen years of Brookland.
























































